Facebook, privacy activist Schrems battle nears end on Dec. 19

This post was originally published on this site
https://i-invdn-com.akamaized.net/trkd-images/LYNXMPEFBC1FW_L.jpg

By Foo Yun Chee

BRUSSELS (Reuters) – Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems’ seven-year battle against Facebook (NASDAQ:) reaches a crucial point on Dec. 17 when an adviser to Europe’s top court will issue his view on whether tools used by companies to transfer data abroad are legal or not.

At stake are standard contractual clauses used by Facebook and hundreds of thousands of companies, ranging from banks to industrial giants to carmakers, to transfer personal data to the United States and other parts of the world.

Another issue is whether the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, which came into existence in 2016 and designed to protect Europeans’ personal data transferred across the Atlantic for commercial use, is lawful or not.

Schrems, an Austrian law student, who successfully fought against the EU’s previous privacy rules called Safe Harbour in 2015, challenged Facebook’s use of standard clauses on the grounds that they do not offer sufficient data protection safeguards.

Facebook’s lead regulator, the Irish Data Protection agency, took the case to the Irish High Court which then sought guidance from the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

The opinion by Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe, advocate general at the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union, is non-binding. However, judges follow such recommendations in four out of five cases. The court will rule in the coming months.

The case has implications for companies because the transfer measures are essential in ensuring the free flow of data to non-EU countries, said Jamie Drucker at UK-based law firm Bristows.

“They underpin some of the most significant business operations, including outsourced services, cloud infrastructure, data hosting, HR management, payroll, finance, and marketing,” he said.

If the Court invalidates the measures, “this would mean they (companies) would either need to suspend transfers of personal data to these countries or risk breaching the GDPR and exposing themselves to significant revenue based fines,” Drucker said.

Landmark privacy rules known as GDPR adopted last year gives privacy watchdogs the power to fine companies up to 4% of their global annual revenue for violations.

The case is C-311/18 Facebook Ireland and Schrems

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Add Comment